2/16 totals within 3 points of the line. Counts describe this selected sample.
Has the pattern changed?
Comparison unavailable: recent 8, preceding 8; each needs 10 meetings. At least 20 selected scores are needed. The selected sample is never extended to fill either window.
Selected scores: – .
Observed frequencies, not predictions or a priced betting edge. Score dates are not publication refresh times.
Set splits
First two sets · n=16
After 1–1 · sample requirements
Not enough meetings in this sample to compare first-set winners at minimum 10. More completed scored meetings are needed.
After 1–1
Different winners of sets 1 and 2 · same H2H sample
First-set winner
Tomas Vorisek wins match
Tomas Flicek wins match
Tomas Vorisek wins S3
Tomas Flicek wins S3
Match over 74.5
Either playern=7
7 qualifying meetings; minimum 10.
Tomas Vorisekn=3
3 qualifying meetings; minimum 10.
Tomas Flicekn=4
4 qualifying meetings; minimum 10.
Set-by-set scoring
Only meetings that reached each set
Set
Tomas Vorisek wins
Tomas Flicek wins
Average points Tomas Vorisek / Tomas Flicek
Combined mean
Over 18.5
Under 18.5
S1n=16
44%7/16
56%9/16
9.9 / 9.4
19.3
S2n=16
50%8/16
50%8/16
8.8 / 8.5
17.3
S3n=16
56%9/16
44%7/16
9.0 / 7.9
16.9
S4n=13
46%6/13
54%7/13
9.2 / 10.0
19.2
Match totals · 74.5
Mean 75.2 · Median 70.5 · Range 47–104
Head-to-head pattern
Same 16 scored meetings
Tomas Vorisek wins38%6/1637.9 average player points
Tomas Flicek wins63%10/1637.3 average player points
Player results · all opponents
Separate published W/L summaries
Tomas Vorisek
9W–11L · 45% wins · n=20
WLLWWLLLWLWWWLWLLWLL
to Opponents and dates
W vs Filip Strejc ·
L vs Filip Cernota ·
L vs Jaromir Zlamal ·
W vs Filip Cernota ·
W vs Martin Stusek ·
L vs Filip Cernota ·
L vs Filip Cernota ·
L vs Martin Stusek ·
W vs Ondrej Kadavy ·
L vs Jaromir Zlamal ·
W vs Jaromir Zlamal ·
W vs Petr Silhan ·
W vs Martin Stusek ·
L vs Jaromir Zlamal ·
W vs Martin Stusek ·
L vs Jaromir Zlamal ·
L vs Filip Cernota ·
W vs Ondrej Kadavy ·
L vs Tomas Flicek ·
L vs Martin Stusek ·
Tomas Flicek
11W–9L · 55% wins · n=20
LLWLWWLLWWWLLLWLWWWW
to Opponents and dates
L vs Ondrej Kadavy ·
L vs Filip Strejc ·
W vs Tomas Vorisek ·
L vs Ondrej Kadavy ·
W vs Ondrej Kadavy ·
W vs Filip Strejc ·
L vs Lukas Soucek ·
L vs Ondrej Kadavy ·
W vs Martin Stusek ·
W vs Tomas Vorisek ·
W vs Ondrej Kadavy ·
L vs Martin Stusek ·
L vs Tomas Vorisek ·
L vs Filip Strejc ·
W vs Vit Benak ·
L vs Tomas Vorisek ·
W vs Martin Stusek ·
W vs Martin Stusek ·
W vs Martin Cerny ·
W vs David Vesecky ·
Stored result summaries; latest coverage and exact event identities are unverified. Player point statistics require complete score records.
Supporting match history · 16/16
All results · 16/16 eligible results. Filters affect this history only.
93 pointsOver 74.5 · First two split
Tomas Vorisek against Tomas Flicek. Match score 2 to 3. Total 93.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Tomas Vorisek
6
12
8
11
6
2
43
Tomas Flicek
11
10
11
7
11
3
50
64 pointsUnder 74.5 · Same first-two winner
Tomas Vorisek against Tomas Flicek. Match score 1 to 3. Total 64.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Tomas Vorisek
4
7
11
5
—
1
27
Tomas Flicek
11
11
4
11
—
3
37
73 pointsUnder 74.5 · First two split
Tomas Vorisek against Tomas Flicek. Match score 3 to 1. Total 73.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Tomas Vorisek
9
11
11
12
—
3
43
Tomas Flicek
11
5
4
10
—
1
30
68 pointsUnder 74.5 · Same first-two winner
Tomas Vorisek against Tomas Flicek. Match score 1 to 3. Total 68.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Tomas Vorisek
9
6
11
6
—
1
32
Tomas Flicek
11
11
3
11
—
3
36
66 pointsUnder 74.5 · First two split
Tomas Vorisek against Tomas Flicek. Match score 1 to 3. Total 66.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Tomas Vorisek
8
11
5
7
—
1
31
Tomas Flicek
11
2
11
11
—
3
35
90 pointsOver 74.5 · Same first-two winner
Tomas Vorisek against Tomas Flicek. Match score 3 to 2. Total 90.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Tomas Vorisek
11
11
7
8
11
3
48
Tomas Flicek
8
5
11
11
7
2
42
55 pointsUnder 74.5 · Same first-two winner
Tomas Vorisek against Tomas Flicek. Match score 0 to 3. Total 55.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Tomas Vorisek
10
7
4
—
—
0
21
Tomas Flicek
12
11
11
—
—
3
34
101 pointsOver 74.5 · Same first-two winner
Tomas Vorisek against Tomas Flicek. Match score 2 to 3. Total 101.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Tomas Vorisek
12
6
11
11
9
2
49
Tomas Flicek
14
11
8
8
11
3
52
68 pointsUnder 74.5 · First two split
Tomas Vorisek against Tomas Flicek. Match score 1 to 3. Total 68.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Tomas Vorisek
11
7
5
6
—
1
29
Tomas Flicek
6
11
11
11
—
3
39
88 pointsOver 74.5 · First two split
Tomas Vorisek against Tomas Flicek. Match score 2 to 3. Total 88.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Tomas Vorisek
11
4
11
6
11
2
43
Tomas Flicek
3
11
7
11
13
3
45
104 pointsOver 74.5 · First two split
Tomas Vorisek against Tomas Flicek. Match score 2 to 3. Total 104.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Tomas Vorisek
13
11
8
11
9
2
52
Tomas Flicek
15
8
11
7
11
3
52
56 pointsUnder 74.5 · Same first-two winner
Tomas Vorisek against Tomas Flicek. Match score 3 to 0. Total 56.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Tomas Vorisek
12
11
11
—
—
3
34
Tomas Flicek
10
4
8
—
—
0
22
91 pointsOver 74.5 · Same first-two winner
Tomas Vorisek against Tomas Flicek. Match score 3 to 1. Total 91.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Tomas Vorisek
13
11
8
17
—
3
49
Tomas Flicek
11
5
11
15
—
1
42
66 pointsUnder 74.5 · First two split
Tomas Vorisek against Tomas Flicek. Match score 3 to 1. Total 66.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Tomas Vorisek
11
7
11
11
—
3
40
Tomas Flicek
4
11
5
6
—
1
26
47 pointsUnder 74.5 · Same first-two winner
Tomas Vorisek against Tomas Flicek. Match score 3 to 0. Total 47.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Tomas Vorisek
11
11
11
—
—
3
33
Tomas Flicek
2
9
3
—
—
0
14
73 pointsUnder 74.5 · Same first-two winner
Tomas Vorisek against Tomas Flicek. Match score 1 to 3. Total 73.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Tomas Vorisek
7
7
11
8
—
1
33
Tomas Flicek
11
11
7
11
—
3
40
Observed samples, not predictions. Match and combined-set lines are separate comparison thresholds. Samples describe the published scored meetings, not complete lifetime history.