Skip to content
Table TennisSplits

← Back to current board

Martin Vizek vs Vladimir Cermak

Czech Liga Pro · · Match 13431019

Loading saved items…

Match total line Slider 40–120
Minimum sample

13 scored H2H meetings · to

Match brief · selected sample

More selected totals are under 74.5

6/13 over · 7/13 under · 0/13 equal to 74.5.

Inspect supporting results ↓

Where totals land

Median 74 · middle 50% 65–85 points

  1. 47–573 meetings
  2. 58–681 meetings
  3. 69–795 meetings
  4. 80–902 meetings
  5. 91–1012 meetings

4/13 totals within 3 points of the line. Counts describe this selected sample.

Has the pattern changed?

Comparison unavailable: recent 7, preceding 6; each needs 10 meetings. At least 20 selected scores are needed. The selected sample is never extended to fill either window.

Selected scores: – .

Observed frequencies, not predictions or a priced betting edge. Score dates are not publication refresh times.

Set splits

First two sets · n=13

After 1–1 · sample requirements

Not enough meetings in this sample to compare first-set winners at minimum 10. More completed scored meetings are needed.

After 1–1

Different winners of sets 1 and 2 · same H2H sample

First-set winnerMartin Vizek wins matchVladimir Cermak wins matchMartin Vizek wins S3Vladimir Cermak wins S3Match over 74.5
Either playern=55 qualifying meetings; minimum 10.
Martin Vizekn=44 qualifying meetings; minimum 10.
Vladimir Cermakn=11 qualifying meetings; minimum 10.

After winning the first set

Each row uses that player’s S1 wins

S1 winnerWins S2Loses S2Wins matchOver 74.5
Martin Vizekn=1267%8/1233%4/1275%9/1242%5/12

Set-by-set scoring

Only meetings that reached each set

SetMartin Vizek winsVladimir Cermak winsAverage points
Martin Vizek / Vladimir Cermak
Combined meanOver 18.5Under 18.5
S1n=1392%12/138%1/1310.6 / 6.617.2
S2n=1369%9/1331%4/139.4 / 8.217.6
S3n=1338%5/1362%8/138.2 / 9.417.5
S4n=1080%8/1020%2/1010.4 / 8.418.8

Match totals · 74.5

Mean 73.4 · Median 74.0 · Range 47–100

Head-to-head pattern

Same 13 scored meetings

Martin Vizek wins69%9/1338.7 average player points
Vladimir Cermak wins31%4/1334.7 average player points

Player results · all opponents

Separate published W/L summaries

Martin Vizek

9W–11L · 45% wins · n=20

LWLLLLLLWWWLWWLLWLWW
to
Opponents and dates
  • L vs Ales Bayer ·
  • W vs Patrik Pycha ·
  • L vs Karel Brozhik ·
  • L vs Karel Schopf ·
  • L vs Tomas Janata ·
  • L vs Ales Hlawatschke ·
  • L vs Ales Bayer ·
  • L vs Ales Hlawatschke ·
  • W vs Karel Schopf ·
  • W vs Daniel Tuma ·
  • W vs Daniel Tuma ·
  • L vs Daniel Tuma ·
  • W vs Tomas Vinter ·
  • W vs Petr Zmuda ·
  • L vs Petr Zmuda ·
  • L vs Vitek Dvorak ·
  • W vs Tomas Janata ·
  • L vs Petr Zmuda ·
  • W vs Richard Krejci ·
  • W vs Jakub Hradecky ·

Vladimir Cermak

13W–7L · 65% wins · n=20

LLLWWWWLLWWWLWWWWLWW
to
Opponents and dates
  • L vs Ales Hlawatschke ·
  • L vs Jan Trefny ·
  • L vs Karel Brozhik ·
  • W vs Daniel Tuma ·
  • W vs Petr Zmuda ·
  • W vs Jan Trefny ·
  • W vs Jan Trefny ·
  • L vs Matej Volf ·
  • L vs Tomas Janata ·
  • W vs Jan Trefny ·
  • W vs Jan Trefny ·
  • W vs Michal Vedmoch ·
  • L vs Petr Dalecky ·
  • W vs Jan Trefny ·
  • W vs Jan Trefny ·
  • W vs Michal Vedmoch ·
  • W vs Jiri Pozarsky ·
  • L vs Jan Trefny ·
  • W vs Pavel Fojt ·
  • W vs Daniel Kouble ·

Stored result summaries; latest coverage and exact event identities are unverified. Player point statistics require complete score records.

Supporting match history · 13/13

All results · 13/13 eligible results. Filters affect this history only.

85 pointsOver 74.5 · First two split
Martin Vizek against Vladimir Cermak. Match score 2 to 3. Total 85.
PlayerS1S2S3S4S5MatchPoints
Martin Vizek4113116235
Vladimir Cermak11911811350

100 pointsOver 74.5 · First two split
Martin Vizek against Vladimir Cermak. Match score 3 to 2. Total 100.
PlayerS1S2S3S4S5MatchPoints
Martin Vizek12991111352
Vladimir Cermak10111188248

65 pointsUnder 74.5 · Same first-two winner
Martin Vizek against Vladimir Cermak. Match score 3 to 1. Total 65.
PlayerS1S2S3S4S5MatchPoints
Martin Vizek1111611—339
Vladimir Cermak44117—126

47 pointsUnder 74.5 · Same first-two winner
Martin Vizek against Vladimir Cermak. Match score 3 to 0. Total 47.
PlayerS1S2S3S4S5MatchPoints
Martin Vizek111111——333
Vladimir Cermak824——014

89 pointsOver 74.5 · First two split
Martin Vizek against Vladimir Cermak. Match score 2 to 3. Total 89.
PlayerS1S2S3S4S5MatchPoints
Martin Vizek11611103241
Vladimir Cermak71171211348

51 pointsUnder 74.5 · Same first-two winner
Martin Vizek against Vladimir Cermak. Match score 3 to 0. Total 51.
PlayerS1S2S3S4S5MatchPoints
Martin Vizek111111——333
Vladimir Cermak198——018

78 pointsOver 74.5 · First two split
Martin Vizek against Vladimir Cermak. Match score 2 to 3. Total 78.
PlayerS1S2S3S4S5MatchPoints
Martin Vizek1133114232
Vladimir Cermak41111911346

74 pointsUnder 74.5 · First two split
Martin Vizek against Vladimir Cermak. Match score 3 to 1. Total 74.
PlayerS1S2S3S4S5MatchPoints
Martin Vizek1151111—338
Vladimir Cermak81198—136

75 pointsOver 74.5 · Same first-two winner
Martin Vizek against Vladimir Cermak. Match score 3 to 1. Total 75.
PlayerS1S2S3S4S5MatchPoints
Martin Vizek1211511—339
Vladimir Cermak107118—136

50 pointsUnder 74.5 · Same first-two winner
Martin Vizek against Vladimir Cermak. Match score 3 to 0. Total 50.
PlayerS1S2S3S4S5MatchPoints
Martin Vizek111111——333
Vladimir Cermak584——017

94 pointsOver 74.5 · Same first-two winner
Martin Vizek against Vladimir Cermak. Match score 2 to 3. Total 94.
PlayerS1S2S3S4S5MatchPoints
Martin Vizek11111069247
Vladimir Cermak58121111347

72 pointsUnder 74.5 · Same first-two winner
Martin Vizek against Vladimir Cermak. Match score 3 to 1. Total 72.
PlayerS1S2S3S4S5MatchPoints
Martin Vizek1111511—338
Vladimir Cermak77119—134

74 pointsUnder 74.5 · Same first-two winner
Martin Vizek against Vladimir Cermak. Match score 3 to 1. Total 74.
PlayerS1S2S3S4S5MatchPoints
Martin Vizek11111011—343
Vladimir Cermak69124—131

Observed samples, not predictions. Match and combined-set lines are separate comparison thresholds. Samples describe the published scored meetings, not complete lifetime history.