1/15 totals within 3 points of the line. Counts describe this selected sample.
Has the pattern changed?
Comparison unavailable: recent 8, preceding 7; each needs 10 meetings. At least 20 selected scores are needed. The selected sample is never extended to fill either window.
Selected scores: – .
Observed frequencies, not predictions or a priced betting edge. Score dates are not publication refresh times.
Set splits
First two sets · n=15
After 1–1 · sample requirements
Not enough meetings in this sample to compare first-set winners at minimum 10. More completed scored meetings are needed.
After 1–1
Different winners of sets 1 and 2 · same H2H sample
First-set winner
Ladislav Havel 1956 wins match
Tomas Nohejl wins match
Ladislav Havel 1956 wins S3
Tomas Nohejl wins S3
Match over 74.5
Either playern=5
5 qualifying meetings; minimum 10.
Ladislav Havel 1956n=0
No qualifying meetings in this sample.
Tomas Nohejln=5
5 qualifying meetings; minimum 10.
Set-by-set scoring
Only meetings that reached each set
Set
Ladislav Havel 1956 wins
Tomas Nohejl wins
Average points Ladislav Havel 1956 / Tomas Nohejl
Combined mean
Over 18.5
Under 18.5
S1n=15
47%7/15
53%8/15
10.1 / 10.0
20.1
S2n=15
80%12/15
20%3/15
10.3 / 7.5
17.9
S3n=15
40%6/15
60%9/15
9.5 / 9.9
19.4
Match totals · 74.5
Mean 74.1 · Median 71.0 · Range 52–99
Head-to-head pattern
Same 15 scored meetings
Ladislav Havel 1956 wins47%7/1537.9 average player points
Tomas Nohejl wins53%8/1536.3 average player points
Player results · all opponents
Separate published W/L summaries
Ladislav Havel 1956
9W–11L · 45% wins · n=20
LLLWWLWLLLWLWWLWWLWL
to Opponents and dates
L vs Miroslav Barta ·
L vs Michal Syroha ·
L vs Lubos Mikyska ·
W vs Miroslav Barta ·
W vs Pavel Berdych ·
L vs Lubor Sulava ·
W vs Michal Syroha ·
L vs Pavel Berdych ·
L vs Lubor Sulava ·
L vs Mihail Trinta ·
W vs Jan Pleskot ·
L vs Jan Framberk ·
W vs Lubor Sulava ·
W vs Tomas Nohejl ·
L vs Tomas Nohejl ·
W vs Mihail Trinta ·
W vs Jan Pleskot ·
L vs Lubos Mikyska ·
W vs Lubos Mikyska ·
L vs Tomas Nohejl ·
Tomas Nohejl
10W–10L · 50% wins · n=20
LWLWWLWLLLWLWWWWLLLW
to Opponents and dates
L vs Mihail Trinta ·
W vs Mihail Trinta ·
L vs Milan Fisera ·
W vs Milan Smrcek ·
W vs Jaroslav Strnad 1964 ·
L vs Mihail Trinta ·
W vs Jaroslav Strnad 1964 ·
L vs Rotislav Hasmanda ·
L vs Tibor Kolenic ·
L vs Mihail Trinta ·
W vs Tibor Kolenic ·
L vs Frantisek Briza ·
W vs Jaroslav Strnad 1964 ·
W vs Jaroslav Strnad 1964 ·
W vs Jan Steffan ·
W vs Vaclav Dolezal ·
L vs Jan Framberk ·
L vs Milan Fisera ·
L vs Mihail Trinta ·
W vs Jan Framberk ·
Stored result summaries; latest coverage and exact event identities are unverified. Player point statistics require complete score records.
Supporting match history · 15/15
All results · 15/15 eligible results. Filters affect this history only.
59 pointsUnder 74.5 · Same first-two winner
Ladislav Havel 1956 against Tomas Nohejl. Match score 3 to 0. Total 59.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Ladislav Havel 1956
11
11
11
—
—
3
33
Tomas Nohejl
9
8
9
—
—
0
26
62 pointsUnder 74.5 · Same first-two winner
Ladislav Havel 1956 against Tomas Nohejl. Match score 3 to 0. Total 62.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Ladislav Havel 1956
11
15
11
—
—
3
37
Tomas Nohejl
9
13
3
—
—
0
25
52 pointsUnder 74.5 · Same first-two winner
Ladislav Havel 1956 against Tomas Nohejl. Match score 3 to 0. Total 52.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Ladislav Havel 1956
11
11
11
—
—
3
33
Tomas Nohejl
7
4
8
—
—
0
19
89 pointsOver 74.5 · First two split
Ladislav Havel 1956 against Tomas Nohejl. Match score 2 to 3. Total 89.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Ladislav Havel 1956
6
11
9
11
9
2
46
Tomas Nohejl
11
6
11
4
11
3
43
57 pointsUnder 74.5 · Same first-two winner
Ladislav Havel 1956 against Tomas Nohejl. Match score 0 to 3. Total 57.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Ladislav Havel 1956
9
7
8
—
—
0
24
Tomas Nohejl
11
11
11
—
—
3
33
74 pointsUnder 74.5 · First two split
Ladislav Havel 1956 against Tomas Nohejl. Match score 1 to 3. Total 74.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Ladislav Havel 1956
9
11
5
9
—
1
34
Tomas Nohejl
11
7
11
11
—
3
40
90 pointsOver 74.5 · Same first-two winner
Ladislav Havel 1956 against Tomas Nohejl. Match score 2 to 3. Total 90.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Ladislav Havel 1956
11
11
10
9
6
2
47
Tomas Nohejl
7
2
12
11
11
3
43
66 pointsUnder 74.5 · Same first-two winner
Ladislav Havel 1956 against Tomas Nohejl. Match score 0 to 3. Total 66.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Ladislav Havel 1956
7
3
16
—
—
0
26
Tomas Nohejl
11
11
18
—
—
3
40
83 pointsOver 74.5 · Same first-two winner
Ladislav Havel 1956 against Tomas Nohejl. Match score 2 to 3. Total 83.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Ladislav Havel 1956
11
11
7
5
7
2
41
Tomas Nohejl
3
6
11
11
11
3
42
58 pointsUnder 74.5 · Same first-two winner
Ladislav Havel 1956 against Tomas Nohejl. Match score 3 to 0. Total 58.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Ladislav Havel 1956
11
12
11
—
—
3
34
Tomas Nohejl
9
10
5
—
—
0
24
98 pointsOver 74.5 · First two split
Ladislav Havel 1956 against Tomas Nohejl. Match score 3 to 2. Total 98.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Ladislav Havel 1956
9
11
11
7
12
3
50
Tomas Nohejl
11
7
9
11
10
2
48
71 pointsUnder 74.5 · First two split
Ladislav Havel 1956 against Tomas Nohejl. Match score 1 to 3. Total 71.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Ladislav Havel 1956
9
11
5
5
—
1
30
Tomas Nohejl
11
8
11
11
—
3
41
87 pointsOver 74.5 · Same first-two winner
Ladislav Havel 1956 against Tomas Nohejl. Match score 3 to 1. Total 87.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Ladislav Havel 1956
16
11
9
11
—
3
47
Tomas Nohejl
14
7
11
8
—
1
40
67 pointsUnder 74.5 · First two split
Ladislav Havel 1956 against Tomas Nohejl. Match score 1 to 3. Total 67.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Ladislav Havel 1956
7
11
8
6
—
1
32
Tomas Nohejl
11
2
11
11
—
3
35
99 pointsOver 74.5 · Same first-two winner
Ladislav Havel 1956 against Tomas Nohejl. Match score 3 to 2. Total 99.
Player
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Match
Points
Ladislav Havel 1956
13
8
11
11
11
3
54
Tomas Nohejl
15
11
7
4
8
2
45
Observed samples, not predictions. Match and combined-set lines are separate comparison thresholds. Samples describe the published scored meetings, not complete lifetime history.